2013年11月10日 星期日

光明會 錫安長老會 聖羅馬帝國和NWO 及森遜密碼驗證: 目擊者看到人們在9/11“蒸發“

光明會 錫安長老會 聖羅馬帝國和NWO 及森遜密碼驗證: 目擊者看到人們在9/11“蒸發“:
目擊者看到人們在9/11“蒸發“
Witnesses Saw People "Vaporized" on 9/11

2011年2月18日 上午 11:55:01
Translation by Autumnson Blog
Total:4,254 - 83% of readers think this story is Fact.
共4,254讀者 - 83%的讀者認為這個故事是事實。
Intro by Nila Sagadevan (compiled by Zen Gardner)
尼拉Sagadevan介紹(昌加德納編輯)

As I revisited this whole nuke thing after all these years and was mulling over the photos of all those singed and bent vehicles, my friend Connie Smith -- a long-time 9/11 researcher some of you may know -- dropped me a note reminding me of something I’d completely forgotten about: the fascinating case of EMT Patricia Ondrovic.
當我在這些年後重新審視這整件核彈事情,並在思索所有那些簽名和彎曲的車輛照片,我的朋友康妮史密斯 - 一位你們有些人可能知道的長期9/11的研究員 - 寫給我一張字條提醒我一些我已完全忘記了的東西:EMT帕特里夏Ondrovic的引人入勝案件。
Connie reminded me of an interview with Ondrovic, published back in October 2001 (and which I’d read circa ‘04). When I expressed an interest to reread it, she dug up a copy and sent it to me (see attached). Ms Ondrovic’s account is truly ‘bizarre’, and a testament to the fact that there were forces at play on 9/11 that modern technology — indeed, mainstream science -- simply cannot explain. Please read the attached PDF doc carefully. It’s one a helluva wake-up call.
康妮提醒我一個與 Ondrovic的採訪,早在2001年10月發佈(而我約在 '04讀到)。當我表示有興趣再讀一遍,她考古發掘出一個副本並把它寄給我(見附件)。Ondrovic女士的敘述是真正的'古怪',和是一件事實的證明,即9/11當天有力量在場那是現代科技 - 事實上是主流科學 - 根本無法解釋。請小心地閱讀附加的PDF文檔,那是一個宏大的覺醒鐘。
As this terrified woman was running pell-mell away from the first collapsing tower -- her hair, coat and feet on fire -- Ms Ondrovic witnessed vehicles parked along the street spontaneously erupt into flames. She even witnessed an aircraft disappear while in flight: “I saw something in the sky, it was a plane, but it was way out. It looked like it was over Jersey or something, then it wasn't there anymore. I saw a small fireball, and it was gone. I saw two other planes. One came in one way, and the other came in the other way, and there was a plane in the middle that was way far off in the distance. Then the plane in the middle just disappeared into a little fire ball. It looked like the size of a golf ball from where I could see it. And the other two planes veered off into opposite directions. I just kept on running north.” And she’s got a lot more to say.
由於這被嚇壞的女性胡亂地走離崩倒的第一樓 - 她的頭髮、外套和腳着火 - Ondrovic小姐目睹沿街停泊的車輛自發地爆發入火焰中,她甚至目睹一架飛機在飛行時消失:“我看到一些東西在天空中,是一架飛機,但它是出去的,它看來像是在新澤西州或什麼的上空,然後它不再存在了;我看到一個小火球,而它就不見了。我看到另外兩架飛機,一架在一方進入,和另一架在另一方進來,及有一架飛機在中間在距離遙遠之處。然後中間的飛機剛消失成一個小火球,從我可看到它的地方,它看上去像一個高爾夫球般大小。而另外兩架飛機衝出往相反的方向。我衹繼續往北走。“和她有更多要說。
Then there’s this other chap Connie knows (“a famous author”) who’d interviewed another woman who had witnessed “people engulfed in some sort of fireball and disintegrating.” Connie just dug up the following note from this person to her, and is checking to see if I may get in touch with him directly.
然後還有這另一傢伙康妮知道的(“一位著名作家”),他採訪了另一位女性,她目擊“人們被某種火球吞沒和分解。”康妮考古掘出下面由這個人給她的字條,並在檢查看看我是否能會與他直接接觸。
"I interviewed a Red Cross worker in Dallas whose name escapes me at the moment but I have her report in my files. She told me she was sent to NYC by the Red Cross to help survivors of the WTC. She said the thing that most stuck out in her mind after interviewing dozens of people was the number that told her of looking back and seeing people engulfed in some sort of fireball and disintegrating.
“我採訪一位在達拉斯的紅十字會工作人員,他的名字在此刻我忘了,但我已經在我的文件報告了她。她告訴我她被紅十字會送往紐約,去幫助世貿中心的倖存者。她說在面見數十人後,在她腦中最突出的事情是那數字,告訴她回頭看並看到人們在某種火球被吞沒和瓦解。
Obviously, a collapsing building cannot produce such an effect. But a mini-nuke shaped charge placed in the basement to blow out the central core columns could. A small nuclear device could also explain the pyroplasmic cloud seen above the WTC, the disintegration and warping of heavy steel beams and the pulverization of so much concrete, not to mention the blood cell cancer now suffered by some of the first responders."
明顯地一座倒塌的建築物不能產生這樣的效果,但一枚小型核彈狀的聚能被裝置在地下室,去爆開中央芯柱就可能了。一個小型核裝置也可以解釋為何 pyroplasmic可在世貿中心的上面看到,解體和重鋼樑變形和這麼多混凝土粉碎,更何況現在一批反應者患有血癌。“
Folks, this obviously isn’t Nanothermite at work here. I can’t even begin to guess what it could be. DEWs, or some similar ‘exotic’ technology, may not be that farfetched after all? As my old Alaskan buddy from Arkansas would’ve exclaimed, “Wayl, ahd be go to hayl!”

Cheers
Nila


(Full quotation by kind permission of Jim Marrs, from his upcoming updated book on 9/11)

By Jim Marrs [Shirley Hoofard: Author’s interview February, 2005]

Felipe David working for Aramark Corp. tending vending machines in a basement of the North Tower recalled, “That day I was in the basement in sub-level 1 sometime after 8:30am. Everything happened so fast, everything moved so fast. The building started shaking after I heard the explosion below; dust was flying everywhere and all of a sudden it got real hot. I threw myself onto the floor, covered my face because I felt like I was burned. I sat there for a couple of seconds on the floor and felt like I was going to die, saying to myself 'God, please give me strength.' When I went in, I told them it was an explosion," David, with his skin hanging in tatters may have been the person helped to safety by William Rodriguez.

Skin dripping off the body was mentioned by several 9/11 victims. Gamma ray radiation can cause a person to just feel heat, then pain and then the skin will be damaged. The skin may be vaporized, charred or left hanging.

Shirley Hoofard was a 38-year-old Red Cross worker in the Dallas area on 9/11. Hoofard was ordered to New York to begin working with victims and their families. She also was ordered not to reveal any information to the media or the public.

“It was very difficult to deal with,” she recalled. “The only way I got through it was to shut down. I didn’t think or feel. I just did what I did. By the middle of January [2002] I said ‘I have to go home.’”

But she could not get out of her mind what some of the victims told her. “Several victims told me they saw people engulfed in a fireball and disintegrating. One man said he was at work when he heard a loud noise and at the far end of the cubicles he saw a man running toward him with a fireball coming after him. The running man just exploded, flying into pieces…I heard stories like that from people from both towers….I don’t know the physics but at what temperature does a human vaporize?”

P.S. from Zen:
Check this out--a further corroberative explanation perhaps?:

美國政府在世界貿易中心使用原子彈,由Ed Ward MD
The US Government's usage of atomic bombs at the WTC, by Ed Ward MD

www.thepriceofliberty.org/06/09/24/ward.htm

Sources: Declassified August 1958: Mere fact that the U. S. has developed atomic munitions suitable for use in demolition work.”

Declassified January 1967, The fact that we are interested in and are continuing studies on a weapon for minimizing the emerging flux of neutrons and internal induced activity.”

Declassified March 1976, The fact of weapon laboratory interest in Minimum Residual Radiation (MRR) devices. The fact of successful development of MRR devices.

The factual evidence indicates that our government is using and has used 3rd or possibly 4th generation hydrogen bombs domestically and internationally. The evidence for international usage is not quite as strong as the domestic usage, but when domestic usage is considered the international usage seems inescapable.

The process of exclusion based on the known facts leaves only one viable option for the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings - a relatively pure hydrogen bomb.

Just some of the facts are: widespread cancer in the responders, molten steel, melted cars, steel beams hurled hundreds of feet, aerosolized metals, vaporized steel witnessed and video, aerosolized and pulverized concrete, elevated tritium levels, vanishing (vaporized) victims, only sliver fragments of victims on roof tops.

EMP - Electro Magnetic Pulse effects on communications, hundreds of eyewitness testimony of ancillary explosions by heroic rescuers and victims, massive dispersal of debris (large ‘missiles’ up to 1,600 feet - small ‘missiles’ up to 0.5 miles), demolition expert states hydrogen bomb needed for this type of demolition.


Audio of a massive explosion prior to collapse, video of ancillary explosions, audio of ancillary explosions, significant reduction in debris pile, ancillary thermate found in wreckage, shockwave of a mini yield nuclear blast knocked people off their feet, vaporization of 200,000 gallons of water.
Removal of wreckage without investigation, only remnants of fire in one tower minutes after the plane collision, unprecedented history of 3 skyscrapers collapsing secondary to fire, early miscalculation stating WTC building 7 ‘pulled’, towers fall at demolition or free fall speed, foreknowledge of WTC 7 immediate collapse, slow-motion video evidence of plane appendage with smoke and explosion immediately prior to impact of both planes.

Unprecedented NORAD non response to variant flights, FEMA drill scheduled for same day, military ‘exercise’ of exactly what was taking place to prevent NORAD response, most of NORAD protection planes sent far away in another ‘exercise’ to prevent response, prevention of examination of wreckage by those assigned to investigate, seismic evidence of a mini yield nuclear explosion.

Cheney takes over NORAD response command, Cheney prevents NORAD response, WTC towers designed for 757 collision and fire, 911 used falsely for previously planned war, government fabrication of ‘evidence’ correlation for starting war, hundreds of people found themselves trapped by locked doors and missing escape routes above and below the impact zone, and not all inclusively, but finally, Bush brands anyone noting any of these facts a terrorist.

The spectrum and percentages of cancer are massive, there are at least 4 classifications of blood-cell cancers: leukemia, lymphoma, Hodgkin’s and myeloma, as well there are many more classifications of soft tissue cancers including brain cancer, and breast cancer, for most of these there are subclassifications of many different types of specific cancer in each, so far not publicly disclosed. There are huge percentages of respiratory distress and loss of function.

Multiple reports of ‘irregular cycles’ (miscarriages?). Most likely there will be several more types of cancer to follow. In particular, responders should be checked for thyroid cancer and function. There has been no noting of birth defects which also needs to be done. There is one thing and only one thing that can cause all these cancers and problems.

RADIATION.
輻射
In response to this myriad of disease, a statement of environmental mercury has been claimed. That claim is not verified in testing of air and particle debris samples by private citizens and organizations. It is possible the mercury quotes are from the federal source of science, the United States Geological Survey’s analysis of the WTC dust debris.

The USGS’s leached analysis did show mercury at the 3rd lowest concentration of metals at the mean value (mv) of 0.011 parts per Billion (ppB). The most abundant element concentration in the leaching tests was Strontium at 1,000 ppB (1 ppM) - 100,000 times more than the mercury value.
It appears that the leaching of the sample was only partial and inadequate as the reader will see from the spectrometry values. Why would only mercury be quoted when there were so many other more dangerous elements at higher concentrations than mercury?

While the regular elements like Copper - mv 136 ppM, Silver - mv 1.66 ppM, and Vanadium - mv 31 ppM, some of the other significant elements were: Barium - mv 533 ppM, Strontium - mv 727 ppM, Cerium - mv 91 ppM, Yttrium - mv 57 ppM, Lanthanum - mv 46 ppM, Molybdenum - mv 11 ppM, Thorium - mv 9 ppM, Uranium - mv 3 ppM, Beryllium - mv 3 ppM, and Cesium - mv 0.6 ppM - partial listing.

For readers that are not familiar with most of these elements, here is a link to their relevance. There is also a claim of environmental benzene that ‘permeated’ the area in jet fuel as the cause of all of these problems. Once again, we have the quoting of the miraculous jet fuel that burns up in a massive fireball in the first few minutes, then like Christ’s feeding the multitudes, still causes a massive fire inside that reaches the temperatures of a Hades that weakens massive fire proofed steel beams and trusses, then resurrects itself on the permeated ground to cause cancer in one hour of limited exposure.


In less than 1 hour, the first WTC building had collapsed and covered Manhattan, in at least 1/3 of a Million Tons of particulate debris. Unless the jet fuel makes a final appearance and is again resurrected by NIST in it’s 3rd miracle, benzene is buried under 1/3 of a million tons of particulate debris after 56 minutes of exposure.
Benzene is also a component of gasoline. The assertion that cancer was the result of 56 minutes of exposure to minimal amounts of benzene is ludicrous. If that was true, everyone in the US would be suffering from cancers. As the 3rd WTC building falls, Manhattan is covered in two Billion pounds of pulverized and aerosolized building.

Two billion pounds seemed like an extremely large amount of particulate matter from buildings whose total weight has been quoted at around 3 billion pounds. Debris removal has been quoted at 1.2 billion pounds. Based on these rough numbers 2/3rds of the building was indeed turned to dust or vaporized.

Live loads on these [perimeter] columns can be increased more than 2,000% before failure occurs.” “One could cut away all the first-story columns on one side of the building, and part way from the corners of the perpendicular sides, and the building could still withstand design loads and a 100-mph wind force from any direction.”

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/427/429/Witnesses_Saw_People_Vaporized_on_9_11.html

(英鏈) 石油巨頭將會否觸發新馬德里巨震?

踢爆911和熱劑故事,是官方的陰謀論?
'via Blog this'

光明會 錫安長老會 聖羅馬帝國和NWO 及森遜密碼驗證: 在一個空心月亮上的月光?

光明會 錫安長老會 聖羅馬帝國和NWO 及森遜密碼驗證: 在一個空心月亮上的月光?:
在一個空心月亮上的月光?
LUNAR LIGHTS ON A HOLLOW MOON?

Monday, February 14, 2011

If the music behind the moon gave you the creeps, I don't blame you - but, I doubt it would have been the single reason for NASA not returning to the moon in over 40 years. After all, 12 men actually walked on it's surface following that.
如果月亮背後的音樂令你毛骨悚然,我不怪你 - 但我懷疑它會已是給美國航空航天局不再重返月球超過 40年的單一原因。畢竟,自那以後實際上有12人走過它的表面。
Nevertheless, official NASA transcripts and blatant censorship of audio transmissions don't get any more ominous.
不過,官方的美國航空航天局文字記錄,和公然的音頻傳輸審查不再變得更為預示的。
Over the past year, I discovered that there are many mysteries in which NASA and the moon share. I've already provided some evidence of NASA obscuring certain elements during the Apollo Missions (more below) - but were they already aware and prepared for spooky things being seen or heard on the moon before the Apollo missions were even launched?
在過去的一年中,我發現有很多謎,其中美國航天局和月亮共享。我已經提供一些在阿波羅登月計劃時美國宇航局模糊某些元素的證據(下文更多) - 但他們是否已經警覺並準備鬼怪的東西在月球上被看見或聽到,甚至在阿波羅登月任務發射之前?
Strange lights and objects have been recorded on our moon for hundreds of years. In 1787, legendary astronomer, Sir William Herschel, recorded strange lights traveling across the dark lunar surface. On one particular occasion of that same year, he spotted 3 red lights in the darkness of the lunar surface, describing the brightest one as being brighter than a recently discovered comet. He also believed there to be large "lunar cities" within the moon's craters and strongly believed in extraterrestrial life - something almost laughable during the 18th century.
幾百年來奇怪的光和物體都已被記錄在我們的月亮上。 在1787年,傳奇的天文學家威廉赫歇爾爵士,記錄奇怪光線橫渡黑暗的月球表面。同年在一個特別的時機,他發現 3盞紅燈在黑暗的月球表面,描述最光亮的一盞比最近發現的彗星更為光亮。他亦認為有大型的“月球城”在月球的隕石坑內,並強烈相信外星生命 - 那在18世紀幾乎是可笑的。 

The classical Greek philosopher, mathematician and scientist Plato also reported anomalous lights on the moon sometime around 400 BC. There is even a crater named after him which experiences high volumes of 'transient lunar phenomenon' - a term that NASA uses to describe these spooky lunar lights. Between the years of 1540 and 1967, over 570+ lights and flashes were recorded over the moon's face. While NASA and other lunar scientists attribute these moving and flashing lights to outgassing and impacts - few reports concerning these phenomena are ever published in peer reviewed scientific journals and are rarely ever discussed among the scientific community.
古典的希臘哲學家、數學家和科學家柏拉圖大約在公元前400年,亦報告了反常燈光在月球上。甚至有一個韻石坑以他命名,那經歷了高體積的'瞬時月球現象' - 一個術語美國宇航局用以形容這些月球鬼光。在 1540年和1967年間,超過 570次 + 燈光和閃光在月亮的面上被記錄。雖然美國航天局和其他月球科學家,認為這些移動和閃爍的光為除氣和撞擊 - 幾乎沒有有關這些現象曾經被發表在同行評審的科學期刊,和很少曾經在科學界被討論過。 
So could great historical minds like Sir William Herschel have been correct? Could it really be possible for a race of extraterrestrials to have been living on our moon for hundreds or thousands of years without public knowledge on Earth?
因此,偉大的歷史腦袋如威廉赫歇爾爵士已是正確的嗎?難道真的有可能有一族的外星人,已生活在我們的月亮上數百或數千年,而不為地球上的公眾所知嗎? 
There are several official NASA photos taken throughout it's lunar expeditions which often depict some extremely large, artificial-looking, structures on the lunar surface. Some of these structures have been estimated to be several miles tall.
有幾張美國宇航局的官式照片在整個月球探索旅程被拍攝到,那常描繪一些非常大、人工外貌的結構在月球表面,其中一些結構已被估計是數英里高。 
However, NASA has tried their best over the years to blur and obscure many of these structures. Often their attempts are extremely blatant.
不過,美國航空航天局多年來已盡力去模糊和朦朧許多這樣的結構。通常他們的企圖都是非常明顯的。

So now we've got some evidence of moving luminous objects and large structures on the moon's surface, and furthermore, that NASA is trying very hard to hide and explain away these things. But what else can we look at? How about the moon's interior? If an extraterrestrial race is hiding on the moon, wouldn't the interior would be the safest and most reclusive spot to hide?

In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon McDonald stated in Astronautics magazine;

"...according to an analysis of the moon's motion, it appears that the moon is hollow: if the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is less dense than the outer parts. Indeed, it would seem that the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere."

In a March 1970 article of Popular Science titled 'How APOLLO 13 Will Probe the Moon's Interior', former SS Nazi & director of NASA, Dr. Wernher von Braun wrote, concerning the crash of Apollo 12's 2.5 ton Lunar Module into the lunar surface;

"The astounding result of that crash: The moon rang like a bell for nearly and hour, indicating some strange and unearthly underground structure."

In that same article, published a month before Apollo 13's failed lunar landing, von Braun goes on to say;

"An Apollo 13 "spectacular" will be the meteor-like crash on the moon of the great Saturn V rocket's whole top stage and instrument unit, totaling more than 15 tons...

...This will be a dramatic scale-up of the Apollo 12 experiment."

Indeed it was. Despite technical malfunctions preventing the Apollo 13 crew from landing on the moon, they still managed to carry out the task of crashing the Saturn V third stage rocket (S-IV B) into it.


This time the moon rang out for over 3 hours!
這一次月亮響了超過3小時!

Back at NASA headquarters in Houston, CAPCOM made this remark to the Apollo 13 astronauts after impact;

"Aquarius, we see the results now from 12's seismometer. Looks like your booster just hit the Moon, and it's rocking a little bit."

However more recently, based on new 'state-of-the-art' seismological analysis of the same Apollo-era data, NASA has concluded that the moon is not hollow - but rather has an 'Earth-like core' made up of mostly mantle with a solid inner core surrounded by a fluid outer core.

So why then, did it ring like a bell for over 3 hours!?

Many scientists opposed to the idea of a hollow moon argue that the lunar crust would have to be extremely dense in order to support the theory - based on the behavior of objects interacting with the moon's gravitational field.

This is something that makes sense - if you are thinking in context of the moon being a 100% natural body. One thing you have to take into account though, is that scientist to this day still have no solid claims as to where the moon actually came from.

Is it possible that it was once a natural celestial body that was hollowed out into various cavities with massive tunneling systems? Could that help to explain the highly anomalous mass concentrations of gravity (mascons) throughout the moon?

New evidence discovered in 2009, confirmed a network of underground tunnel systems, which would be ideal for human habitation. Arizona State University's lead researcher on the topic, Mark Robinson, had this to say;
新證據在2009年發現,證實一地下隧道網絡系統,那將是非常適合人類居住。在該主題的亞利桑那州立大學的首席研究員馬克羅賓遜,是這樣說的;
"They could be entrances to a geologic wonderland... The tunnels offer a perfect radiation shield and a very benign thermal environment..."
“它們可能是入口往地質的仙境...隧道提供一個完美的輻射盾和一個非常良好的熱環境...“
In 2010, NASA released a series of images taken by their Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) which displayed the moon's topography in never before seen clarity and detail.
在2010年,美國宇航局發布一系列的影像,由他們的月球偵察軌道器(LRO)所拍的,那展示月球的地形以從未見過的清晰度和詳細。
I can't help but notice how similar our moon looks in comparison to a metal-plated ball covered in dust that's been sprinkled with water. Not much variation of crater depth - as if something below the dusty surface is preventing much impact damage to the inner-exterior & interior.
我禁不住但注意到我們的月亮看來是如何類似,相比一鍍金的球被塵土覆蓋及灑了水。沒有太多變化的韻石坑深度 - 正如有些東西在灰塵表面的下面在防止大撞擊對內部室外及室內的破壞。
Does all of this truly indicate that the moon is a partially artificial object inhabited by an extraterrestrial civilization? I would once again like to point out that we haven't been back there in over 40 years.

Even after the Bush administration announced a return to the moon by 2020 (which could very well have just been a cover), many have criticized a return to the moon. It was only too soon before President Obama cancelled the entire project.

So where does this leave us?
那麼這在什麼地方離開我們?
It's becoming increasingly obvious that someone doesn't want us to know the whole truth. But why? What does NASA know about the moon that we don't? For starters, NASA knows, at the very least, that extraterrestrials are visiting Earth.
它在變得漸加明顯,有人不希望我們知道整個真相,但為什麼呢?甚麼是關於月亮的美國宇航局知道而我們不呢?對初學者來說,美國航空航天局最起碼知道外星人在造訪地球。
How do I know this? Because NASA astronauts told me so.
我如何知道呢?因為美國航天局的宇航員這樣告訴我。
'via Blog this'

關於我們 | 香港飛碟學會 Hong Kong UFO Club

關於我們 | 香港飛碟學會 Hong Kong UFO Club:
本會宗旨
香港飛碟學會由香港一群熱衷研究外星人/不明飛行物體的朋友成立,是香港註冊的合法 團體,本會有16年歷史, 1996年底成立,無論你對 UFO 資訊有無認識都歡迎加入,唯一入會資格就是:開放的心靈!會員完全自由抱持任何見解或信念,飛碟學會以「推介 UFO 資訊」為宗旨,作為一個意見交流廣場。希望能帶領大家 :
  • 科學化研究 UFO資訊
  • 認識飛碟學 UFOLOGY
  • 從外星訊息學習新宇宙觀
  • 反思人類自身問題
  • 正視新時代訊息 探索宇宙真相

我們希望透過合辦講座、電影晚會、圖書館、網頁、書刊影帶製作及翻譯等,將全球外星人熱潮本地化,將飛碟學這門知識整合的科學普及化。

本會宣言
各國政府有責任向全體地球人公開以下事實:全球每 2-3 分鐘就發生一宗飛碟目擊案。自 1947 年起,75000 宗來自 133 國家目擊飛碟案例中,65% 証人是太空人、飛機師、軍人、航空控制員。50年代全球大國已成立秘密部門專事研究及隱瞞外星人的事實。各國太空署內藏駭人數目飛碟照。萬千第三四五類接 觸留下飛碟片段、照片、錄音、對談記錄、外星金屬被壓制毀滅。全球古蹟證實人類文明、外星接觸遠朔至十萬百萬年,與各地古智慧吻合。今日已有科學界、軍政 團體承認 UFO 來自外星,正從事天文考古、外星科技、外星政治、外星生物學研究:修改歷史、考古、人類學的暗湧已高捲。在外星現像已呈上聯合國、歐洲國會議程的今天,讓 我們至少走出第一小步與時並進──接受 飛碟外星人已來到地球的事實。

這個會做些什麼?
過去 16 年,本會在越來越多外星資訊愛好者支持之下,已舉辦數以百次的各項活動,亦多次與各機構合辦各種大型活動,包括有:
  •     飛碟講座及展覽
  •     出版《宇宙人》會刊
  •     書籍,光碟翻譯製作
  •     舉辦飛碟學課程
  •     舉行 UFO 議會
  •     小組聚會
  •     於各中小學及專上學院舉行講座及展覽
  •     綱頁製作
  •     圖書館,飛碟資料管理

這個會的經費何來?
本會是以非牟利團體方式運作,沒有接受任何外間資助。各幹事及講者均是義務主持活動,本會所需的有限經費主要來自:
  •     主要是「飛碟講座」的入場費;
  •     各機構,熱愛飛碟學人仕慷慨捐出場地及其他物資。

捐款請存入 匯豐銀行戶口號碼 : 106-240005-001 劃線 支票抬頭為 「 Hong Kong UFO Club」
'via Blog this'

香港國際UFO議會2012 5DVD + 1CD | 香港飛碟學會 Hong Kong UFO Club

香港國際UFO議會2012 5DVD + 1CD | 香港飛碟學會 Hong Kong UFO Club:

'via Blog this'